Salt OS for Energy

Interconnection
Study Copilot

Salt OS orchestrates governed project evaluation workflows for renewables, grid, and utility teams. Upload a project — get a go/no-go recommendation with full audit trail.

18.3s

Avg. workflow time

8

Pipeline nodes

100%

Audit coverage

01
Platform

The intelligence fabric for regulated energy workflows

Salt OS is not another energy data vendor. It sits between your existing systems — Orennia, Enverus, Wood Mackenzie, PLEXOS — and orchestrates the work across them.

Governed Orchestration

Salt sits between your existing systems and orchestrates work across them. It connects internal documents, external intelligence, and domain analytics into one auditable pipeline.

Full Explainability

Every decision is traceable. Click into any node to see which sources, tools, and assumptions informed the result. Complete audit trail for compliance teams.

Model Optionality

Hot-swap models while preserving pipelines. Choose the right model for each task — from document extraction to risk scoring to memo generation.

Private Deployment

Deploy behind your firewall. Salt keeps governed AI workflows inside the compliance perimeter. SOC 2 compliant with enterprise-grade security.

System Integration

Salt does not replace Orennia, Enverus, Wood Mackenzie, PLEXOS, or your internal systems. It connects them into a unified workflow.

Role-Based Access

Granular access controls ensure the right people see the right data. Approval workflows route decisions through proper channels.

02
Secure Intake

New project arrives

The user uploads the Red Mesa Solar + Storage project packet and asks Salt to evaluate the site. Salt operates inside the customer's secure environment.

Secure Environment
Behind Firewall

Upload project packet

Drag files or click to browse. Supports PDF, XLSX, DOCX.

U

User Prompt

"Evaluate Red Mesa Solar + Storage in ERCOT West and tell me whether we should advance the project."

Ingested Documents

Red_Mesa_Site_Packet_v2.3.pdf

4.2 MB

Site Packet

Preliminary_Interconnection_Study.pdf

2.8 MB

Interconnection

Engineering_Notes_Q4.pdf

1.1 MB

Engineering

Capex_Model_2025.xlsx

890 KB

Financial

Permitting_Checklist.pdf

340 KB

Permitting

Development_Summary.docx

520 KB

Summary
Extracted Parameters
TechnologySolar + BESS
Capacity350 MW / 150 MWh
RegionERCOT West
Target CODQ2 2028
Queue Position#47
SiteRed Mesa, TX
03
Orchestration

Workflow graph builds

Salt shows a governed pipeline with nodes for intake, knowledge retrieval, market intelligence, comparable analysis, grid risk, finance impact, memo generation, and approval routing.

03b
Market Intelligence

External data integration

Salt queries external intelligence sources for congestion data, market pricing, and renewable energy forecasts — all within the governed workflow.

Energy market analytics dashboard showing transmission congestion, LMP pricing trends, and interconnection queue statistics
04
Risk Analysis

Key findings surface

Salt identifies the most important grid, permitting, cost, and schedule risks in plain language — making the workflow useful to executives, not just analysts.

Grid Congestion
high
78%Upgrade Probability

Odessa 345kV Corridor Congestion

The Odessa-Midland transmission corridor shows persistent congestion with curtailment rates exceeding 12% during peak solar hours. ERCOT planning studies indicate 47 active projects competing for limited transmission capacity in this zone.

Transmission Upgrades
high
$18-24MEstimated Cost

Network Upgrade Cost Exposure

Based on comparable projects in ERCOT West, estimated network upgrade costs range from $18M to $24M. Historical data shows 67% of projects in this corridor required upgrades exceeding $15M.

Permitting
medium
+4.2 moAvg. Delay

County Permitting Timeline Risk

Red Mesa site spans two county jurisdictions requiring separate permitting processes. Historical data shows dual-county projects average 4.2 months longer than single-county approvals.

Capex Sensitivity
medium
8.7%Downside IRR

IRR Sensitivity to Upgrade Costs

Under the high-upgrade scenario, project IRR drops from 11.2% to 8.7%, falling below the 9.5% internal threshold. LCOE increases by $4.20/MWh, reducing competitiveness in PPA negotiations.

Schedule
medium
14-18 moStudy Timeline

Interconnection Study Timeline

Current ERCOT queue position (#47 of 112) suggests 14-18 month study timeline. Comparable projects averaged 16.3 months from application to IA execution.

Market Outlook
low
$38-42Avg. $/MWh

Favorable Long-Term Pricing

ERCOT West solar + storage projects benefit from strong merchant pricing outlook. Forward curves show $38-42/MWh average through 2030 with upside from data center load growth.

05
Deliverable

Executive recommendation memo

Salt produces a polished one-page recommendation memo with go/no-go guidance, supporting evidence, risk assessment, and required next steps.

Executive Recommendation Memo

CONFIDENTIAL — INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

Red Mesa Solar + Storage

350 MW Solar / 150 MWh BESS — ERCOT West — Project Evaluation

Recommendation

Conditional Advance

Executive Summary

Red Mesa Solar + Storage presents a commercially viable opportunity in ERCOT West with favorable long-term pricing fundamentals. However, significant grid congestion risk on the Odessa 345kV corridor and high probability (78%) of costly transmission upgrades ($18-24M) create material downside exposure. We recommend advancing to full interconnection study with enhanced transmission risk monitoring and parallel evaluation of alternative POI configurations.

Risk Assessment

Grid Congestion
High
Transmission Upgrades
High
Permitting Timeline
Medium
Capex Sensitivity
Medium
Market Pricing
Low
Resource Quality
Low

Base Case IRR

11.2%

Target: 9.5%

Downside IRR

8.7%

Below threshold

LCOE Impact

+$4.20

Per MWh

Required Next Steps

1

Proceed with full ERCOT interconnection study application

2

Commission independent transmission congestion analysis

3

Evaluate alternative POI at Barilla Junction 345kV

4

Update financial model with network upgrade scenarios

5

Engage county permitting counsel for dual-jurisdiction strategy

6

Schedule investment committee review for Q2 2026

Approval Routing

VP DevelopmentPending Review
Head of AnalyticsPending Review
Investment CommitteeAwaiting

Audit Trail

10:42:18
Workflow initiated
10:42:20
14 documents ingested
10:42:22
Parameters extracted
10:42:24
Knowledge base queried
10:42:27
Market intelligence retrieved
10:42:30
Grid risk analysis complete
10:42:33
Finance impact calculated
10:42:36
Memo generated
10:42:37
Routed for approval
06 — Explainability

Every decision is
fully traceable

Click into any node in the workflow graph to see which sources, tools, and assumptions informed the result. Complete audit trail for compliance and governance teams.

Source Tracing

Every data point links back to its source document, API call, or model output.

Version Control

Track versioned runs and compare outputs across different model configurations.

Compliance Ready

Audit trails meet enterprise requirements for regulated energy workflows.

Coming Soon

Predictive Maintenance

Copilot for utilities

Regulatory Reporting

Automated compliance

Energy Consulting

Client-by-client analysis

Project Finance

Diligence copilot